Friday, September 27, 2013

Design Case Study Summary


    Playground is a digital creative agency located in Canada. The company has been around for 4 years and is continuing to grow and expand. Playground helps their clients broaden the horizon in terms of creativity and innovation. The team at Playground is always looking to add a sense of exuberance to every project they work on and felt their branding should represent that. This year Playground decided to take on the task of rebranding.



An image of the original Playground Inc. logo.
PLAYGROUND LOGO CIRCA 2009


    First they started with the logo. The original logo for playground used a simple sans serif font in a standard shade of grey. The "O" in "Playground" was purple and elevated above the rest of the other letters. Light grey dashes are placed over the "G" and "R" so the "O" is depicted as a ball bouncing. While the logo was very playful and clean the colors made branding very limiting. While purple interprets a slight whimsical vibe, it is a very finite color and Playground desired to do more. The name of the company conceptually ties into Playgrounds approach to everything. The logo needed to represent the dual meaning of work and play. After a great deal of time the creative minds at the company came up with a logo they were very pleased with. The new logo illustrates a deep purple hexagon with rounded edges. Inside the hexagon a white scripted "P" is placed. To the right of the hexagon is "playground inc." is presented as a sans serif type face in black. Many people felt the new logo was a bad combination of the "P" in Pintrest and the hexagon in Simplebits. Eventually Playground realized they needed to push further and find a new, fresh and timeless identity for them to take ownership of.                                     

NEW PLAYGROUND LOGO


    Playground was left with ambition and inspiration from the branding work of Paul Rand and Massimo Vignelli. They took it upon themselves to create a simple, but bold logo that was both geometric and timeless. Playground felt the hexagonal "P" was very geometric and clean while the color red makes the brand appear very approacable. The color red doesn't have as many limits as purple giving the brand a fresh and fast feel. 

The final Playground logo
PLAYGROUND LOGO 2013

   Rebrand sounds like a death sentence yet it can launch a company into many new ares and provide new opportunities. I think that rebranding can either help or hurt a company. This is illustrated with the development of Playground's logo. If you look at Playground's logo from 2009 and then the 2013 one there is a notable difference and feel between the two. More and more companies are rebranding themselves, trying to create a new image for the new age. If anyone should learn anything from rebranding it should be that simplicity is often the better option. Simplicity doesn't mean a boring corporate logo, but something that is fresh and modern. 

              




Friday, September 20, 2013

Photoshop Logo

   This is a logo I designed in class. It was designed in photoshop with the help of a tutorial. Video tutorials are not something that I'm great at following along to, but the logo looks fine. Last year I started using Illustrator more and didn't focus as much on photoshop. This was defiantly a factor that challenged me with this tutorial. In this tutorial the use of layer masks greatly effected the outcome. 

Friday, September 6, 2013

Douglas C. Engelbart


Douglas C. Engelbart was set on making the world a better place through the technology of computers. He is known for his demonstration known as "The Mother Of All Demos" in 1968. There he demonstrated many technologies, particularly the mouse. His legacy lives on through the inventions he created and through the The Doug Engelbart Institute founded by him and his daughter Christina. He and many other innovative minds pushed through the wall and guided us to where modern technology stands today. 

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Blogger vs. Google Sites

In contrast to setting up a site in Google Sites, Blogger is much more user friendly. Blogger is easy to use and very customizable, but Blogger is more of a "blog" rather than a "website". Google Sites is good for someone who needs separate pages for different kinds of content. Blogger is good for someone who wants to run a blog where the use of pages comes into play, but posts are overridden by an archive.